Subway shocker: A cheaper tunnel under the Hudson Published: Friday,
November 19, 2010, 5:52 AM
 Star-Ledger Editorial Board

Amanda Brown/The Star-Ledger The multi-billion Hudson River train tunnel
construction site sits empty. Now, New York City is looking at extending
one of its subway lines into New Jersey.

The news that New York City is interested in building a subway tunnel
under the Hudson River is both welcome and shocking.  Right now, this idea
is nothing more than a four-page memo from Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s
office that resurrects a strategy discarded long ago. There is no money
set aside for it, no study of the engineering or environmental impacts
and no coalition fighting for needed aid from Washington. This could
easily be a mirage.  But rub your eyes and take a look. At about half
the cost of the Access to the Region’s Core rail tunnel that Gov. Chris
Christie killed, this plan proposes to deliver as many commuters, or more,
to good jobs in Manhattan.  New Jersey needs that connection more than
New York City does. More than 250,000 New Jerseyans commute every day
to jobs that pay 60 percent more, on average, than jobs here. This is
a pillar of this state’s prosperity. Without a new tunnel, it will
grind to a halt, and the new jobs will go to commuters from New York
and Connecticut.  What’s shocking is that this was not a larger part
of the conversation all along. If it proves viable, this could be the
Plan B that Christie never proposed after walking away from the ARC
tunnel. Lucky thing that at least New York City hasn’t given up.
The subway plan, unlike the New Jersey plan, would force commuters to
switch at Secaucus. But it would give riders the ability to go straight
to Grand Central Station, which the ARC plan did not. If it really does
cost half as much, that’s an easy trade-off to accept.  Can this really
work? At this stage, who knows? But let’s kick the tires and find out.
© 2010 NJ.com. All rights reserved.